Abstract.In contradistinction to the contemporary human sciences, recent theological accounts of the individual‐in‐relation continue to defend the concept of the singular continuous self. Consequently, theological anthropology and the human sciences seem to offer widely divergent accounts of the sense of self‐fragmentation that many believe pervades the modern world. There has been little constructive interdisciplinary conversation in this area. In this essay I address the damaging implications of this oversight and establish the necessary conditions for future dialogue. I have three primary (...) objectives. First, I show how the notion of personal continuity acquires philosophical theological significance through its close association with the concept of personal particularity. Second, through a discussion of contemporary accounts of self‐multiplicity, I clarify the extent of theological anthropology's disagreement with the human sciences. Third, I draw upon narrative accounts of identity to suggest an alternative means of understanding the experiential continuity of personhood that maintains the tension between self‐plurality, unity, and particularity and thereby reconnects philosophical theological concerns with human‐scientific analyses of the human condition. Narrative approaches to personhood are ideally suited to this purpose, and, I suggest, offer an intriguing solution to understanding and resolving the problem of self‐fragmentation that has caused recent theological anthropology so much consternation. (shrink)

CAN actions be right irrespective of the motives from which they come? Can an action be right though coming from a bad or an ‘indifferent’ motive?

τοτων σ οτωσ χóντων χρ σοκεν νεναι πολλ τε καì παντοα ν πσι τοσ συγκρινομνοισ κα σπρματα π;ντων χρημ;των κα σασ χοντα κα χροισ κα σονσ. κα νθρπονσ τε συμπαγναι κα τ λλα ξᾦα σα Ψυχ;ν χει. κα τοσ γε νθρποισιν ευναι κα πλεισ συνκημνασ κα τ λλα σᾦα óσα κατεσκνασμενα, ωσπερ παρ' ημíν, και την γην αυτοισι πυειν πολλ τε και παντοιων εκεινοι τα ονηιστα συνενεγκμενοι εíσ την οικησιν χρωνται. ταυτα μεν ουν μοι λλεκται περι τσ ποκρισιοσ, xsτι οửκ (...) ν παρ' μíν μóνον ποκπιθεíη, λλ καì λλη. (shrink)

τοτων σ οτωσ χóντων χρ σοκεν νεναι πολλ τε καì παντοα ν πσι τοσ συγκρινομνοισ κα σπρματα π;ντων χρημ;των κα σασ χοντα κα χροισ κα σονσ. κα νθρπονσ τε συμπαγναι κα τ λλα ξᾦα σα Ψυχ;ν χει. κα τοσ γε νθρποισιν ευναι κα πλεισ συνκημνασ κα τ λλα σᾦα óσα κατεσκνασμενα, ωσπερ παρ' ημíν, και την γην αυτοισι πυειν πολλ τε και παντοιων εκεινοι τα ονηιστα συνενεγκμενοι εíσ την οικησιν χρωνται. ταυτα μεν ουν μοι λλεκται περι τσ ποκρισιοσ, xsτι οửκ (...) ν παρ' μíν μóνον ποκπιθεíη, λλ καì λλη. (shrink)